|
|
|
|||
|
By Bob Enzel
We were sitting around one evening--my golf partners and I--when the subject of golf course amenities and the “complete golf experience” came up. I was looking for writing points on the several courses we had recently played, such as, ‘lots of traps’ and ‘water everywhere.’ Or, perhaps, ‘the narrow fairways were a challenge”. But the comments I heard sort of surprised me. The responses were mostly about the amenities. Now I tend to agree that amenities are important, yet golfers don’t take golf vacations and play courses based on amenities- or do they?
Here were the complaints:
Let’s make the above into a golf conundrum…and you decide. Scenery helps define a golf course, but golfers rarely stop to admire—really admire---the scenery. Golfers are intent upon getting a little ball into a little hole which is all but invisible and happens to be 500 yards away. The layout of a course is important and who may have designed it works well in advertising. A Joe-Shmoe designed golf course won’t draw as well as a Jack Nicholas designed course. Face it, we golfers are snobs and that’s the way we like it.
Course “A” is more famous because it hosted a professional tournament. Course “B” has never hosted a professional event. Course “A” is more expensive to play then course “B.” Course “A” does not have GPS system or provide a decent course layout on its scorecard. Course “B” offers both of the above. Let’s toss one more item into the comparison. Course “A” is laid out between expensive homes that “pepper” the course and surround the fairways. Course “B” is essentially wide open and scenic. In plain English Course “B: offers several amenities that Course “A” does not provide, yet is less expensive to play. Many golfers would choose Course “A” because it’s
considered the more in of the two courses. On the other hand
discerning golfers would not return to Course “A”, but would probably return
to Course “B”. If you disagree with this premise, you’ll pay more
for less. Consider that there are more recreational “bogey” golfers then ‘scratch’ golfers. I’ve never been a ‘scratch’ golfer so I can only guess that they don’t play for the “golf experience.” Sure, they like to play golf and they play often or they wouldn’t be ‘scratch’ golfers. But face it, recreational golfers are by far the larger group and without them all golf courses would go under. “Scratch” golfers want a challenge. Therein lays the rub. Recreational golfers not only want, but need the complete golf experience-the peace and quiet, the serenity, the beautiful scenery, the first class customer service and the facilities. The price they pay should be reflected in the golf course and in the amenities provided by that golf club. So, begging the question. Do golf course amenities play
a significant role in choosing Paraphrasing FOX News, “I reported, now you decide.” Addendum: AAA Magazine had a recent article that was
titled, “Ahhhmenities.” But the AAA article focused on hotel “perks” as in
complimentary limousine service, “perfect pillows” and
concierge-arranged-pet-sitting. We’re not talking perks.
|
||||
|
||||